Comments on: The Three Doors of Type Systems http://hackerboss.com/the-three-doors-of-type-systems/ Developing software and managing development teams. Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:10:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v= hourly 1 By: Daniel http://hackerboss.com/the-three-doors-of-type-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-912 Daniel Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:11:08 +0000 http://hackerboss.com/?p=1349#comment-912 Why wait? The <a href="http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/" rel="nofollow">D Programming Language</a> has had type inference for <a href="http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog1.html#new0137" rel="nofollow">over four years</a>. Actually, D (1.0 and moreso the upcoming 2.0) has many of the features that C++0x has been promising, sometimes years in advance. My personal favourite was implementing C++0x style futures entirely in library code. :P Why wait? The D Programming Language has had type inference for over four years. Actually, D (1.0 and moreso the upcoming 2.0) has many of the features that C++0x has been promising, sometimes years in advance.

My personal favourite was implementing C++0x style futures entirely in library code. :P

]]> By: Ville Laurikari http://hackerboss.com/the-three-doors-of-type-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-613 Ville Laurikari Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:01:40 +0000 http://hackerboss.com/?p=1349#comment-613 I haven't kept up with the development of C++, so I wasn't aware that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x#Type_inference" rel="nofollow">the next version of C++ will have type inference</a>. Thanks for the tip. Looks like we'll still have to wait a couple of years for that, though. I haven’t kept up with the development of C++, so I wasn’t aware that the next version of C++ will have type inference. Thanks for the tip. Looks like we’ll still have to wait a couple of years for that, though.

]]> By: Michal Mocny http://hackerboss.com/the-three-doors-of-type-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-611 Michal Mocny Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:26:11 +0000 http://hackerboss.com/?p=1349#comment-611 Completely agree :) C++0x will have the 'auto' keyword and decltype, so, I guess it will soon fit into that boat as well. Completely agree :)

C++0x will have the ‘auto’ keyword and decltype, so, I guess it will soon fit into that boat as well.

]]>