<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Why Apple Doesn&#8217;t Want Your App</title> <atom:link href="http://hackerboss.com/why-apple-doesnt-want-your-app/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://hackerboss.com/why-apple-doesnt-want-your-app/</link> <description>Developing software and managing development teams.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:56:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: ab</title><link>http://hackerboss.com/why-apple-doesnt-want-your-app/comment-page-1/#comment-1624</link> <dc:creator>ab</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:11:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hackerboss.com/?p=1726#comment-1624</guid> <description>it&#039;s interesting... Apple started off handling filesystems differently in the early days.  they were different.  now they&#039;ve switched 100% to the UNIX hierarchy.  they started off using different chips.  now they&#039;ve switched to Intel, like all the rest.  they started off using a Forth BIOS.  now they&#039;ve switched to using Intel&#039;s mini UNIX (aka EFI, Tiano, etc.).to me, the only innovative aspects of Apple anymore seem to be in the hardware.anyone can buy Intel chips and anyone can put together a UNIX release.it just seems silly trying to &quot;lock down&quot; software (it might be impossible?) when you using more or less the same code with more or less the same CPU everyone else is using. what is different, what is unique?is it true that the OLPC will make &quot;jailbreaking&quot; and OPLC very simple and easy?  if yes, are kids that learn computing on such machines really going to put up with Apple&#039;s tactics when they learn how to use Forth on their OPLC?the kids of tomorrow will create their own simple, easy-to-use software.  they will be able to control any CPU.  and they won&#039;t need Apple&#039;s approval to share their creations with others.feel free to delete my comments if you disagree with them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s interesting&#8230; Apple started off handling filesystems differently in the early days.  they were different.  now they&#8217;ve switched 100% to the UNIX hierarchy.  they started off using different chips.  now they&#8217;ve switched to Intel, like all the rest.  they started off using a Forth BIOS.  now they&#8217;ve switched to using Intel&#8217;s mini UNIX (aka EFI, Tiano, etc.).</p><p>to me, the only innovative aspects of Apple anymore seem to be in the hardware.</p><p>anyone can buy Intel chips and anyone can put together a UNIX release.</p><p>it just seems silly trying to &#8220;lock down&#8221; software (it might be impossible?) when you using more or less the same code with more or less the same CPU everyone else is using. what is different, what is unique?</p><p>is it true that the OLPC will make &#8220;jailbreaking&#8221; and OPLC very simple and easy?  if yes, are kids that learn computing on such machines really going to put up with Apple&#8217;s tactics when they learn how to use Forth on their OPLC?</p><p>the kids of tomorrow will create their own simple, easy-to-use software.  they will be able to control any CPU.  and they won&#8217;t need Apple&#8217;s approval to share their creations with others.</p><p>feel free to delete my comments if you disagree with them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ab</title><link>http://hackerboss.com/why-apple-doesnt-want-your-app/comment-page-1/#comment-1599</link> <dc:creator>ab</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:12:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hackerboss.com/?p=1726#comment-1599</guid> <description>i&#039;m glad others see that apple is a hw co.i wish they would just sell us the hw w/o the os nonsense.there&#039;s also the &#039;meme&#039; that unix made hw irrelevent.  i.e. it&#039;s portability.apple uses unix concepts e.g. unix filesystems, and unix user-mode progs.  they borrow a lot re: &quot;sw&quot;.if there is anything &quot;innovative&quot; in apple&#039;s &quot;sw&quot; it&#039;s their kernels and to some extent their design sense (=aesthetically pleasing and user-friendly).the former is not very accessible to consumers.  but that could change.  to control hw one must be familiar with the kernel.  perhaps consumers will demand more control over apple hw, as it&#039;s performance is challenged by other more &quot;open&quot; alternatives.  users may want better performance and hence more control over the hw.i guess there&#039;s a balance between &quot;design&quot; and &quot;performance&quot;.  apple *hw* is superb design relative to the alternatives.  but apple &quot;sw&quot; and os abstractions are mostly borrowed; the same stuff is available for free from many sources.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m glad others see that apple is a hw co.</p><p>i wish they would just sell us the hw w/o the os nonsense.</p><p>there&#8217;s also the &#8216;meme&#8217; that unix made hw irrelevent.  i.e. it&#8217;s portability.</p><p>apple uses unix concepts e.g. unix filesystems, and unix user-mode progs.  they borrow a lot re: &#8220;sw&#8221;.</p><p>if there is anything &#8220;innovative&#8221; in apple&#8217;s &#8220;sw&#8221; it&#8217;s their kernels and to some extent their design sense (=aesthetically pleasing and user-friendly).</p><p>the former is not very accessible to consumers.  but that could change.  to control hw one must be familiar with the kernel.  perhaps consumers will demand more control over apple hw, as it&#8217;s performance is challenged by other more &#8220;open&#8221; alternatives.  users may want better performance and hence more control over the hw.</p><p>i guess there&#8217;s a balance between &#8220;design&#8221; and &#8220;performance&#8221;.  apple *hw* is superb design relative to the alternatives.  but apple &#8220;sw&#8221; and os abstractions are mostly borrowed; the same stuff is available for free from many sources.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ville Laurikari</title><link>http://hackerboss.com/why-apple-doesnt-want-your-app/comment-page-1/#comment-1164</link> <dc:creator>Ville Laurikari</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:51:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hackerboss.com/?p=1726#comment-1164</guid> <description>Yeah, most apps are crap.  It doesn&#039;t matter what technologies were used to create them.  Poor performance is not often the main source of crapness, either.As for distributing apps inside a company - there&#039;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.apple.com/support/iphone/enterprise.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iPhone Developer Enterprise Program&lt;/a&gt; which allows you to do just that, given that the company is big enough.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, most apps are crap.  It doesn&#8217;t matter what technologies were used to create them.  Poor performance is not often the main source of crapness, either.</p><p>As for distributing apps inside a company &#8211; there&#8217;s the <a
href="http://developer.apple.com/support/iphone/enterprise.html" rel="nofollow">iPhone Developer Enterprise Program</a> which allows you to do just that, given that the company is big enough.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rezmason</title><link>http://hackerboss.com/why-apple-doesnt-want-your-app/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link> <dc:creator>Rezmason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:38:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hackerboss.com/?p=1726#comment-1163</guid> <description>&quot;Layered&quot; apps perform worse, statistically. I agree with that. But I think most Objective-C apps on the Apple Store are already pieces of crap. Designing, developing and producing one more will hardly change anything; for today&#039;s iPhone developers, you need plenty of luck (as well as Apple&#039;s approval, of course) to make any kind of dent in the marketplace.Anyway, the whole idea of the App Store is bent over backwards. What if I want to produce and distribute an app only to the iPhone users in my company? I&#039;m shiddaddoluck. The iPhone platform runs on amazing hardware, but it really hasn&#039;t matured at all, and until it does, developers who don&#039;t want to kneel before iZod won&#039;t feel any intense pressure to write apps for it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Layered&#8221; apps perform worse, statistically. I agree with that. But I think most Objective-C apps on the Apple Store are already pieces of crap. Designing, developing and producing one more will hardly change anything; for today&#8217;s iPhone developers, you need plenty of luck (as well as Apple&#8217;s approval, of course) to make any kind of dent in the marketplace.</p><p>Anyway, the whole idea of the App Store is bent over backwards. What if I want to produce and distribute an app only to the iPhone users in my company? I&#8217;m shiddaddoluck. The iPhone platform runs on amazing hardware, but it really hasn&#8217;t matured at all, and until it does, developers who don&#8217;t want to kneel before iZod won&#8217;t feel any intense pressure to write apps for it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tweets that mention Apple doesn't care about your app. Probably. &#124; Hacker Boss -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://hackerboss.com/why-apple-doesnt-want-your-app/comment-page-1/#comment-1150</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention Apple doesn't care about your app. Probably. &#124; Hacker Boss -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:07:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://hackerboss.com/?p=1726#comment-1150</guid> <description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Juha Autero and Vladimir Nagy, Ville Laurikari. Ville Laurikari said: Why Apple Doesn’t Want Your App http://goo.gl/fb/Xv87M [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Juha Autero and Vladimir Nagy, Ville Laurikari. Ville Laurikari said: Why Apple Doesn’t Want Your App <a
href="http://goo.gl/fb/Xv87M" rel="nofollow">http://goo.gl/fb/Xv87M</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk

Served from: hackerboss.com @ 2012-02-05 20:47:05 -->
